Buntingford Civic Society Buntingford Civic Voice
October 2017
September 2017
July/August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
July/August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Sep 2012
May 2012
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
Art Competition 2011
November 2010
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
December 2009
November 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
Essay Competition
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
LATEST EVENTS MEMBERS ARCHIVE JOURNALS SERVICES ABOUT

Once again I must start my report with news of more dwellings in Buntingford being allowed on appeal. A development of 43 homes on land designated for commercial use adjacent to Park Farm has been allowed on appeal despite it being recommended for refusal by EHDC. The fact that it goes against the emerging EHDC local plan and also the Buntingford and Community Area Neighbourhood Plan was not sufficient to stop the Inspector from finding in favour of 'sustainable development' because of EHDC's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

I do have a problem with this - the issue I have is with the word 'sustainable'. As far as I am concerned any further development in Buntingford is patently not sustainable. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) defines sustainable development thus:

"There are three dimensions to sustainable development: economic, social and environmental. These ... give rise to the need for the planning system to perform a number of roles: an economic role ... a social role ... and an environmental role ... These roles should not be undertaken in isolation, because they are mutually dependent."

Surely on this basis any further development in Buntingford is economically, socially and environmentally unsustainable? Inspectors seem not to understand or want to recognise this.

To rub salt into the wounds, according to an agenda item for the next East Herts Council District Planning Executive Panel they now have a new approach to Master Town Planning defined as follows:

"Throughout the development of the Plan the Council has made it clear that it is seeking to ensure that development of the highest quality comes forward, fully supported by infrastructure and delivering a range of aspirations that the Council and the community in general has about the benefits to be delivered as part of development."

"These aspirations can be best identified and achieved through a collaborative master planning approach to the bringing forward of sites for development."

Very laudable - and exactly what we asked for in Buntingford three years ago. None of the above has been applied in Buntingford, with piecemeal speculative development allowed through the strict application of the NPPF which just happens to be a developers charter! Master Town Planning - wouldn't that have been a good idea for Buntingford!

Graham Bonner, Chairman, Buntingford Civic Society


If you have any queries about Buntingford Civic Society or issues you would like to raise, you can email the Chairman direct at chairman@buntingfordcivic.org.uk.


Touch Of Glamour

Traceys Travel

A Cut Above

Attend2health

B&M Installations

Bowtell Electrical Contractors

Buntingford Karate Club

Buntingford Mowers

Cameo Kitchens

J Oliver Radley

John D Kilby

Jo Jangles

Jo Morden Hair Design

iNtrol

KB Tyres Ltd.

Layston Nursery